Luxembourg
02 March 2017
Reporter: Stephanie Palmer
ITAS: UCITS V not smooth sailing yet
Although UCITS V has already been implemented, there are still issues that local regulators need to iron out, according to a speaker at ITAS Luxembourg.

Speaking on a panel on the implementation of UCITS V, Isabelle Lebbe, vice president of international transfer agency at Franklin Templeton Investments, noted that, globally, “the clients we advise are now compliant with the new regime, with a few exceptions.”

Some aspects of the regulation remain unclear, she said, and these aspect are being addressed in different ways because “we don’t have sufficient guidance”.

Under UCITS V, depositories have a duty to verify their instruction with the laws, regulation and fund rules, and this “proves to be difficult”, Lebbe said. She questioned how far the depository should be expected to go in these cases—for sharia-compliant funds, for example, it is unclear whether a depository is responsible for verifying compliance with sharia rules.

Lebbe suggested that funds and depositories should “clarify this in the depository document” in order to avoid further confusion.

The panel moderator, Andrea Mornato of Invesco Asset Management, moved on to address the issue of remuneration under UCITS V, suggesting that there are challenges from local regulators, where some have adopted clear guidelines and other have not.

He also pointed to the rage of other regimes such as the second Markets in Financial Instruments Directive and the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, which are attempting to address the same issue, but tackling it from different angles, leading to inconsistencies.

Lebbe pointed out that, for remuneration, UCITS V includes a proportionality rule, allowing institutions to adapt the guidelines to meet their own situation. While some management companies have been quite risk averse in their implementation, others have stretched the rules, trying to stick, as far as possible, to their current position.

According to Lebbe, the Luxembourg regulator asked for proposals of implementation of the new rules, but so far “we have seen no reaction at all”.

While she argued that, while there are no clear rules there will be no strict expectation of compliance, one audience member suggested that, in fact, the regulator is purposely leaving regulations open to interpretation so that when an issue arises, it can “nail” those companies with more relaxed versions in place.

The audience member went on to say that management companies are still using these kinds of freedoms “for competitive advantage”, calling this “a fundamental problem in the industry”.

More regulation news
The latest news from Asset Servicing Times
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Broadridge takes on SFTR reporting requirements
20 June 2017 | New York | Reporter: Stephanie Palmer
Broadridge is addressing trade reporting requirements set to come in with the Securities Financing Transaction Regulation, launching a new solution spanning the entire reporting lifecycle
European regulations still causing confusion
14 June 2017 | Berlin | Reporter: Stephanie Palmer
The regulatory environment is breeding change, and complication, for both investors and fund managers, according to panellists at Fund Forum International in Berlin
EC proposes ‘two-tier’ approach to CCP regulation
13 June 2017 | Brussels | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
EU legislators have proposed a massive overhaul of central counterparty supervision
European Commission hands more power to ESMA after CMU review
09 June 2017 | Brussels | Reporter: Stephanie Palmer
The European Commission is to hand the European Securities and Markets Association more powers in order to improve the effectiveness of the Capital Markets Union
US Financial CHOICE Act passes House of Representatives
09 June 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Drew Nicol
US President Donald Trump’s efforts to turn back the clock by gutting the bulk of post-crisis regulation took another step forward yesterday, with the House of Representatives passing the Financial CHOICE Act unopposed
FCA releases results of dividend arbitrage review
07 June 2017 | London | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Some UK-based firms engaged in dividend arbitrage may not be identifying the risk posed by contrived or fraudulent trading for the purpose of making illegitimate withholding tax reclaims, according to the FCA
The Futures Industry Association has expressed “grave concerns” about the European Commission’s plans to force relocation of euro clearing
More regulation news