07 June 2017
Reporter: Stephanie Palmer

EC’s forced relocation of euro clearing would weaken financial stability, says FIA

The Futures Industry Association (FIA) has expressed “grave concerns” about the European Commission’s plans to force relocation of euro clearing.

In a letter addressed to Valdis Dombrovskis, vice president of the European Commission, FIA president Walt Lukken noted the importance of protecting financial stability, but suggested that forced relocation of euro-denominated cleared derivatives would be “the most disruptive and expensive approach to overseeing third-country central counterparties (CCPs), without improving the oversight of this activity.”

The letter came as a response to a European Commission communication issued on 4 May, which suggested that further safeguarding of the financial system is required, and that this could include increased supervision of euro clearing and forced relocation.

In the communication, the European Commission said: “In view of the challenges in the area of derivatives clearing, further changes will be necessary to improve the current framework that ensures financial stability and supports the further development and deepening of the Capital Markets Union.”

It went on: “Specific arrangements based on objective criteria will become necessary to ensure that, where CCPs play a key systemic role for EU financial markets and directly impact the responsibilities, including financial stability and monetary policy, of EU and member state institutions and authorities, they are subject to safeguards provided by the EU legal framework.”

“This includes, where necessary, enhanced supervision at EU level and/or location requirements.”

The FIA, however, said it has “grave concerns” about this approach, arguing that forced relocation would “fragment these markets, raise costs for end users, and weaken the stability of the financial system.”

The letter went on: “The location of clearing activity should be driven by legitimate market forces operating within a regulatory framework suited for a global market.”

It suggested that forced relocation would lead to fragmentation between euro-denominated derivatives cleared in the EU non-euro denominated derivatives, which will likely continue to be traded outside of the EU. This would “have an adverse effect on systemic risk”, the letter said.

In a statement, Lukken added that forced relocation would be detrimental to end users “that rely on these markets for hedging and managing their exposure to risk”, and suggested that the required security in clearing could be achieved through improved oversight and recognition alone.

He said: “FIA believes that the commission’s suggestion of recognition and enhanced supervision are more effective ways to protect financial stability than forced relocation of the clearing of euro-denominated products.”

More regulation news
The latest news from Asset Servicing Times
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
LEIs offer major cost savings, says OFR
17 November 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Drew Nicol
The OFR noted that early academic studies found that cost savings associated with adoption of the LEI approached $1 billion annually
MTS and UnaVista to collaborate for SFTR
13 November 2017 | London | Reporter: Jenna Lomax
The collaboration means that firms trading on MTS’s new global collateral management segment will be able to use UnaVista’s trade repository to trade under SFTR
LSE teams up with APIR Systems to brings LEIs to Australasia
08 November 2017 | London | Reporter: Drew Nicol
Industry estimates suggest more than 250,000 entities are still without the required LEIs
MiFID II creates “much uncertainty” for EEA members
06 November 2017 | Oslo | Reporter: Jenna Lomax
For EEA members, “much uncertainty” remains regarding ESMA's assessment of the EEA legal basis for MiFID II, according to Norway’s Finanstilsynet
SimCorp: MiFID II remains a concern for buy-side firms
01 November 2017 | London | Reporter: Becky Butcher
Some 28 percent of buy-side representatives are still unsure if and how their firm will be affected by MiFID II, just 90 days before the implementation deadline, according to a SimCorp survey
SEC grants relief to US brokers on MiFID II
27 October 2017 | New York | Reporter: Theo Andrew
The division of investment management issued three no-action letters, providing 30 months relief, allowing US broker-dealers to receive payments in hard dollars
Solvassure creates first-of-its-kind integrated reg platform
25 October 2017 | London | Reporter: Theo Andrew
The compliance platform addresses demands under the General Data Protection Regulation and the Accountability Regime, to help firms meet next year's regulatory deadlines
More regulation news