07 June 2017
Reporter: Stephanie Palmer
EC’s forced relocation of euro clearing would weaken financial stability, says FIA
The Futures Industry Association (FIA) has expressed “grave concerns” about the European Commission’s plans to force relocation of euro clearing.

In a letter addressed to Valdis Dombrovskis, vice president of the European Commission, FIA president Walt Lukken noted the importance of protecting financial stability, but suggested that forced relocation of euro-denominated cleared derivatives would be “the most disruptive and expensive approach to overseeing third-country central counterparties (CCPs), without improving the oversight of this activity.”

The letter came as a response to a European Commission communication issued on 4 May, which suggested that further safeguarding of the financial system is required, and that this could include increased supervision of euro clearing and forced relocation.

In the communication, the European Commission said: “In view of the challenges in the area of derivatives clearing, further changes will be necessary to improve the current framework that ensures financial stability and supports the further development and deepening of the Capital Markets Union.”

It went on: “Specific arrangements based on objective criteria will become necessary to ensure that, where CCPs play a key systemic role for EU financial markets and directly impact the responsibilities, including financial stability and monetary policy, of EU and member state institutions and authorities, they are subject to safeguards provided by the EU legal framework.”

“This includes, where necessary, enhanced supervision at EU level and/or location requirements.”

The FIA, however, said it has “grave concerns” about this approach, arguing that forced relocation would “fragment these markets, raise costs for end users, and weaken the stability of the financial system.”

The letter went on: “The location of clearing activity should be driven by legitimate market forces operating within a regulatory framework suited for a global market.”

It suggested that forced relocation would lead to fragmentation between euro-denominated derivatives cleared in the EU non-euro denominated derivatives, which will likely continue to be traded outside of the EU. This would “have an adverse effect on systemic risk”, the letter said.

In a statement, Lukken added that forced relocation would be detrimental to end users “that rely on these markets for hedging and managing their exposure to risk”, and suggested that the required security in clearing could be achieved through improved oversight and recognition alone.

He said: “FIA believes that the commission’s suggestion of recognition and enhanced supervision are more effective ways to protect financial stability than forced relocation of the clearing of euro-denominated products.”

More regulation news
The latest news from Asset Servicing Times
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Clearstream sets sights on CSDR licence
17 July 2017 | Frankfurt | Reporter: Drew Nicol
Deutsche Börse subsidiary Clearstream is set to apply for new licenses to operate under the central securities depositories regulation
Fend off reform fatigue, urges FSB
06 July 2017 | Hamburg | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The Financial Stability Board has called on the leaders of G20 nations to fend off reform fatigue and continue to work together
ESAs set the KID straight
05 July 2017 | London | Reporter: Stephanie Palmer
The European Supervisory Authorities have clarified some of the finer points around the Key Information Document required under the Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products Regulation
FCA reveals final MiFID II rules
04 July 2017 | London | Reporter: Stephanie Palmer
The authority has set out the ways in which the UK's policy will go beyond the requirements of the directive, but noted that it has an obligation to consider the government’s economic policies
MiFID II a threat to market liquidity
29 June 2017 | Warsaw | Reporter: Stephanie Palmer
New rules under MiFID II could restrict liquidity in the market and have a negative effect on securities lending and repo industry, according to Anna Biala, a partner at Clifford Chance
MiFID II unbundling compliance will be last-minute scramble for 85 percent
23 June 2017 | London | Reporter: Stephanie Palmer
Asset managers are cutting it fine in compliance with research unbundling rules under MiFID II, with 85 percent saying they expect to be compliant in Q4 2017 or later, ahead of the January 2018 deadline
ICMA: NSFR will make EU repo less attractive
23 June 2017 | London | Reporter: Drew Nicol
The association also point to increased automation of highly manual and labour-intensive processes of the market as a way to mitigate rising costs and create efficiencies
More regulation news