London
05 July 2017
Reporter: Stephanie Palmer
ESAs set the KID straight
The European Supervisory Authorities have clarified some of the finer points around the Key Information Document (KID) required under the Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products (PRIIPS) Regulation.

The European Securities and Markets Association, the European Banking Association and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority released a question and answer document relating to the KID, which will become mandatory on 1 January 2018, in a bid to promote common supervisory responses and practices in implementing the new rules.

Responding to questions raised by various stakeholders, the document covers the presentation, content and review of the KID, and clarifies methodologies around risk, reward and cost information.

Specifically, the Q&A addressed look-through requirements for underlying investments when dealing with a fund-of-fund. The authorities noted that calculations should take into account any costs incurred by underlying funds, or by other underlying PRIIPs.

The document said: “Where the underlying investments are PRIIPs producing KIDs, it will only be necessary to obtain cost information from the KIDs. Where the underlying investments do not have KIDs, it will be necessary to obtain KID equivalent information for the direct underlyings.”

The Q&A also clarified that any benefits from securities lending will be taken into account in the performance section of a KID, is they are passed to the investor. If the benefits are not passed on, then they will be accounted for as costs.

With regards to derivatives, the document said that futures, call options and put options that are traded on a regulated market could be grouped together according to their types, “as long as the relevant product characteristics … that determine the presentation of risks and costs in the KID are the same within that group”.

Non-exchange traded derivatives, however, may “differ considerably in terms of risk or reward and costs structure as a result of the characteristics of the trading venue”.

Therefore, an equivalent level of granularity in the KID should only be possible for those that have the same relevant characteristics as those traded on a regulated market.

For over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives, the document said: “It is not possible to use the same approach as for call and put options and futures traded on a regulated market.”

KIDs for OTC derivatives should show the relationship with the underlying asset, the type of underlying asset, the currency of the notional amount, underlying value of the contract, and a representative price, term or interest rate, plus any other features considered to be relevant.

This content should be based on market conditions that are applicable while the OTC derivative contract is available to retail investors.

The document clarified: “This means that the KID should not be based on purely hypothetical data nor that it has to contain specific contractual data. In turn, this means that it could be acceptable to draw up a single KID for a class or group of OTC derivatives that share the same relevant product characteristics.”

The full Q&A document is available here

More regulation news
The latest news from Asset Servicing Times
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Clearstream sets sights on CSDR licence
17 July 2017 | Frankfurt | Reporter: Drew Nicol
Deutsche Börse subsidiary Clearstream is set to apply for new licenses to operate under the central securities depositories regulation
Fend off reform fatigue, urges FSB
06 July 2017 | Hamburg | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The Financial Stability Board has called on the leaders of G20 nations to fend off reform fatigue and continue to work together
ESAs set the KID straight
05 July 2017 | London | Reporter: Stephanie Palmer
The European Supervisory Authorities have clarified some of the finer points around the Key Information Document required under the Packaged Retail and Insurance-based Investment Products Regulation
FCA reveals final MiFID II rules
04 July 2017 | London | Reporter: Stephanie Palmer
The authority has set out the ways in which the UK's policy will go beyond the requirements of the directive, but noted that it has an obligation to consider the government’s economic policies
MiFID II a threat to market liquidity
29 June 2017 | Warsaw | Reporter: Stephanie Palmer
New rules under MiFID II could restrict liquidity in the market and have a negative effect on securities lending and repo industry, according to Anna Biala, a partner at Clifford Chance
MiFID II unbundling compliance will be last-minute scramble for 85 percent
23 June 2017 | London | Reporter: Stephanie Palmer
Asset managers are cutting it fine in compliance with research unbundling rules under MiFID II, with 85 percent saying they expect to be compliant in Q4 2017 or later, ahead of the January 2018 deadline
ICMA: NSFR will make EU repo less attractive
23 June 2017 | London | Reporter: Drew Nicol
The association also point to increased automation of highly manual and labour-intensive processes of the market as a way to mitigate rising costs and create efficiencies
More regulation news